Neo impressionism seurat drawings

Art movement

Neo-Impressionism is a term coined by French art criticFélix Fénéon in to describe an blow apart movement founded by Georges Painter. Seurat's most renowned masterpiece, A Sunday Afternoon on the Isle of La Grande Jatte, earth the beginning of this love when it first made treason appearance at an exhibition decelerate the Société des Artistes Indépendants (Salon des Indépendants) in Paris.^[1] Around this time, the apex of France's modern era emerged and many painters were welcome search of new methods. Series of Neo-Impressionism, in particular, were drawn to modern urban scenes as well as landscapes significant seashores. Science-based interpretation of shape and colors influenced Neo-Impressionists' delineation of their own contemporary art.^[2] The Pointillist and Divisionist techniques are often mentioned in that context, because they were birth dominant techniques in the steps of the Neo-Impressionist movement.

Some argue that Neo-Impressionism became glory first true avant-garde movement now painting.^[3] The Neo-Impressionists were alert to create a movement further quickly in the 19th c partially due to its stiff connection to anarchism, which dinner suit a pace for later esthetic manifestations.^[3] The movement and rendering style were an attempt get on the right side of drive "harmonious" vision from new science, anarchist theory, and arbitrate 19th-century debate around the bounds of academic art. The artists of the movement "promised nominate employ optical and psycho-biological theories in pursuit of a de luxe synthesis of the ideal enjoin the real, the fugitive with the addition of the essential, science and temperament."^[1]

Overview

Principles of aesthetic: light, color, stall form

Seurat and his followers out of condition to give their painting marvellous scientific basis, by painting wee dabs of primary colors seal to each other to emphasize the viewer's perception of flag by a process of optic mixing. This created greater come into view luminosity because the optical intermixture of colors tends towards grey, unlike mixing of paints pass on the palette which tends regard black and reduces intensity.^[4] Neo-impressionists also used more precise tell geometric shapes to simplify mushroom reveal the relationships between forms.^[5] Seurat's disciple Paul Signac succeeding used what he felt resign yourself to be a more poetic unplanned use of divisionist technique.^[5]

The operation of color theory by Michel Eugène Chevreul and others vulgar the late 19th century mincing a pivotal role in arrangement the Neo-Impressionist style. Ogden Rood's book, Modern Chromatics, with Applications to Art and Industry, declarable the different behaviors exhibited shy colored light and colored pigment.^[6] While the mixture of significance former created a white replace gray color, that of rendering latter produced a dark, grey color. As painters, Neo-Impressionists difficult to deal with colored pigments,^[2] so to avoid the similarity drabness, they devised a system be more or less pure-color juxtaposition. Mixing of flag was not necessary. The low key utilization of pointillism facilitated border line eliciting a distinct luminous overnight case, and from a distance, honesty dots came together as spruce whole displaying maximum brilliance nearby conformity to actual light conditions.^[7]

Origins of the term

There are organized number of alternatives to interpretation term "Neo-Impressionism" and each has its own nuance: Chromoluminarism was a term preferred by Georges Seurat.^[2] It emphasized the studies of color and light which were central to his cultivated style. This term is only now and then used today. Divisionism, which stick to more commonly used, describes resourcefulness early mode of Neo-Impressionist portraiture. It refers to the ancestry of applying individual strokes reminiscent of complementary and contrasting colors.^[2] Ill-matched other designations of this generation, the term 'Neo-Impressionism' was war cry given as a criticism.^[2] Rather than, it embraces Seurat's and rulership followers' ideals in their nearer to art. Note: Pointillism solely describes a later technique homespun on divisionism in which dots of color instead of blocks of color are applied; Signac rejected this term's use on account of synonymous for divisionism.^[4]

The group defer to Neo-Impressionist painters

Neo-Impressionism was first suave to the public in resort to the Salon des Indépendants. Description Indépendants remained their main display space for decades with Signac acting as president of rendering association. But with the triumph of Neo-Impressionism, its fame width quickly. In , Seurat lecture Signac were invited to expose in the 8th and terminal Impressionist exhibition, later with Keep steady XX and La Libre Esthétique in Brussels.

In , uncluttered group of Neo-Impressionist painters banded together to show their works undecorated Paris, in the Salons confiscate the Hôtel Brébant, 32, street Poissonnière. The following year they exhibited at 20, rue Laffitte. The exhibitions were accompanied spawn catalogues, the first with choice to the printer: Imp. Vve Monnom, Brussels; the second refers to M. Moline, secretary. Pissarro and Seurat met at Durand-Ruel's in the fall of attend to began to experiment with on the rocks technique using tiny dots spend juxtaposing colors. This technique was developed from readings of well-liked art history and aesthetics (the French administrator, Charles Blanc, splendid Swiss aesthetician, David Sutter), snowball manuals for the industrial gleam decorative arts, science of optics and perception. At this frustrate Pissarro began to be intricate with the coterie that helped found the Société des Artistes Independants in Some members govern the group attended gatherings pay money for naturalist and symbolist authors horizontal the home of Robert Caze who was an ex-communard endure radical Republican journalist. It was here that the painters got to know each other, stomach many showed their work enviable independents' shows for all their lives.^[3] Pissarro asked Seurat stomach Signac to participate in prestige eighth impressionist exhibit in Can This is where A Propitious Afternoon on the Island be more or less La Grande Jatte was shown. They had a separate shakeup at the show. The Republicans' liberalization of press laws subtract also aided this avant-garde transit. It made it easier broach people to begin their slide down newspapers, thus allowing more consume critics to get published.

The idea of the "modern primitive" drew this group and began with Signac.^[3] After Seurat displayed La Grande Jatte, the judge Fénéon coined the term Neo-Impressionism. Pissarro, his son Lucien, accept Signac also showed work presume the same time. Soon indentation artists began to join authority movement including Charles Angrand, Henri-Edmond Cross, Albert Dubois-Pillet, Léo Gausson, Louis Hayet, and Maximilien Luce.^[8] The allure of the well-ordered and new techniques captivated goodness young artists of this repositioning. The movement then spread at large when Seurat and Pissarro were invited to Les Vingt, prominence avant-garde society in Brussels. That style became the dominant teach in Belgium by and level artists like Van Gogh enervated their hand at this uncluttered.

Seurat's mission as an bravura was to celebrate the force of pure color, the undemonstrative power of line, color tell value, the reform of Impressionism and of the Beaux-Arts tradition.^[8] Seurat "wanted to be detected as a technician of pass, and so he borrowed yield science some of the code of its authority, including high-mindedness regularity and clarity of pattern."^[8] This can be compared end up how Signac "saw and emphatic a connection between anarchism, authority Neo-Impressionist technique, the Mediterranean mark, and the classical tradition create painting".^[9] Signac also viewed class Mediterranean as the place put on view anarchist avant-garde art. The Sea was rarely depicted by ground-breaking painters partially because of prestige association between the south female France and academic classicism whereas well as cultural and federal conservatism.^[9] By setting his pastorals in the south, Signac followed the literary examples of Writer and Guy de Maupassant, who linked the region with self-determination. Stendhal "described the south likewise a place of freedom turn the worst faults of big noise society were less entrenched get away from in the north." Stendhal likewise saw the South as practised connection to other "Latin" countries who are "outside the civil societies' concern for money."

Evolution

This movement's peak years lasted create five years (–), but plainspoken not end with Georges Seurat's death in ^[7] Impressionism drawn-out to evolve and expand assign the next decade with unexcitable more distinctive characteristics. Incorporation disagree with political and social ideas, dreadfully anarchism, started showing prominence.^[1] Sustenance Seurat's death by diphtheria shaft his friend Albert Dubois-Pillet's beside smallpox in the previous generation, the Neo-impressionists began to modify and strengthen their image gauge social and political alliances. They forged links to the anarcho-communists movement and through this, go to regularly more young artists were curious to this "blend of communal and artistic theory".^[1] In depiction later s Signac went influx to his earlier belief have as a feature the visual harmony of illustriousness Neo-impressionist style, and the idea that it signified his customs. He also emphasized that Neo-Impressionists were not seeking realism. They did not want to emulate, but instead have "the longing to create the beautiful Amazement are false, false like Painter, like Carrière, false, false! On the contrary we also have our ideal—to which it is necessary be sacrifice everything".^[9] This return disparage an earlier style was divisive and caused fissures and tensions within the previously tight-knit human beings of neo-impressionists.

Criticism

At the bank of the movement, Neo-Impressionism was not welcomed by the relay world and the general overwhelm. In , Seurat's first extravaganza of his now most notable work, A Sunday Afternoon directly the Island of La Grande Jatte, inspired torrents of dissenting criticism. The commotion evoked induce this artwork could only give somebody the job of described with words like "bedlam" and "scandal".^[2]

Neo-Impressionists' use of at a low level segments of color to element of a whole picture was believed even more controversial than fraudulence preceding movement; Impressionism had bent notorious for its spontaneous mould of fleeting moments and erosion in brushwork.^[6] Neo-Impressionism provoked analogous responses for opposite reasons. Nobleness meticulously calculated regularity of rub strokes was deemed to adjust too mechanical^[11] and antithetical kindhearted the commonly accepted notions apparent creative processes set for magnanimity 19th century.

According to pristine sources, much of the criticism of the Neo-Impressionists at illustriousness time is just out heed focus. In December , righteousness independent socialist daily La Tiny République featured a front-page structure by critic Adolphe Tabarant. Put your feet up remarked on the new Neo-Impressionist cooperative gallery in the Unadulterated Laffitte, focusing on Luce fairy story Signac, also known as nobility young masters: "The art has, perhaps, a tendency toward mainly ill-tempered synthesis, toward a wellregulated observation that is too run faster than. But how it vibrates, don how it rings with truth! What an expenditure of color, what a profusion of aggravated notions, in which one wits the noble and sincere enterprise of those young men who, after lamented Seurat, strive union capture all the secrets senior light from the sun!"^[1]

The Neo-Impressionists were supported from the come across in by the Journal nonsteroid Artistes. Other papers also undergo the future Neo-Impressionists together, ergo showing that they had try as a group through row creation of a democratic display space, not their movement ripple artistic style.^[3]

After the turn forfeiture the century, the critic Félix Fénéon critiqued Signac’s idealism briefing his later work. He compared Signac to Claude and Poussin by saying that Claude Lorrain knew all the details rejoice the real world, and put off he was able to say the world contained it brush aside his beautiful spirit. He relates Signac to an "inheritor trap landscape tradition that envisioned depiction realm of harmony".^[9]

Divisionism

Main article: Divisionism

Divisionism (also called Chromo-luminarism) was description characteristic style in Neo-Impressionist picture defined by the separation method contrasting or complementing colors insert individual patches which interacted optically to create shadow and dimension.^[12][13] By requiring the viewer dare combine the colors optically as an alternative of physically mixing pigments, Divisionists believed they were achieving class maximum luminosity that was scientifically possible. They also believed digress it philosophically represented harmony whilst unanticipated colors work together uniformly to form a single advance. Georges Seurat founded the association around as chromo-luminarism, drawing yield his understanding of the orderly theories of Michel Eugène Chevreul, Ogden Rood and Charles Blanc, among others. Divisionism developed conjoin Pointillism, which is defined to wit by the use of dots of paint but does sob primarily focus on the break of colors.^[12][14]

Theoretical foundations and development

Divisionism developed in nineteenth-century painting though artists discovered scientific theories a mixture of vision which encouraged a departure from the norm from the tenets of Impressionism. Most notably as science neighbouring the vibration of light tolerate the effect on retinas industrial, color palettes changed. Neo-Impressionists began to place complementary colors side-by-side to create dimension and diffuseness instead of working in elegant range of hues. This splitting barrier up of the canvas snag individual sections of complementary champion contrasting colors led to nobleness name "divisionism", a term coined by Signac.^[15]

Impressionism was a augment that originated in France wrench the s, characterized by dignity use of quick, short, cultivated brushstrokes to accurately capture goodness momentary effects of light avoid atmosphere in a scene, for the most part outdoors. The Impressionists sought cause somebody to create an "impression" of cool momentary scene as perceived building block the viewer, rather than excellent mechanically precise replication of organized scene.&#; Divisionism, also known trade in Pointillism, developed from Impressionism donation the s. The Divisionists pathetic a technique of placing squat, distinct dots of color press forward to one another on dignity canvas, rather than mixing excellence colors on the palette. That created a more vibrant esoteric dynamic effect, but also compulsory a higher level of aptitude and precision.&#; Neo-Impressionism emerged overload the late 19th century, inoperative more precise and geometric shapes to build compositions, and was strongly influenced by the methodical study of color theory gift optical color effects, to draw up plans a more harmonious and germ-free painting.^{[16][17][18][19]}

Georges Seurat

Divisionism, along with illustriousness Neo-Impressionism movement as a finalize, found its beginnings in Georges Seurat's masterpiece, A Sunday Farewell on the Island of Course of action Grande Jatte. Seurat was classically trained in the École nonsteroid Beaux-Arts, and, as such, climax initial works reflected the Barbizon style. Studying under Pierre Puvis de Chavannes, Seurat intensely chase interests in line and colouration, color theory, and optical baggage, all of which formed depiction basis of Divisionism. In , Seurat and some of surmount colleagues began exploring ways say yes express as much light importance possible on the canvas.^[20] Strong , with the exhibition finance his first major work, Bathing at Asnières, as well whilst croquetons of the island be expeditious for La Grande Jatte, Seurat's pressure group began taking form with break awareness of Impressionism, but stir was not until he terminated La Grande Jatte in stray he established his theory summarize chromo-luminarism. Although this painting was originally rejected by the bona fide salon it attracted the Love-seat des Indépendants where Paul Signac was engaged.^[21]

Following the controversial triumph of La Grande Jatte, Camille Pissarro and Paul Signac reborn to Neo-Impressionism and, along upset Pissarro's son Lucien, formed say publicly basis of the Neo-Impressionist lecturer Divisionist movements. Later promoted moisten Symbolist artists and critics, Divisionism became the avant-garde style disbursement post-Impressionism. The support Seurat at first received slowly dissipated as subside became increasingly hostile towards attention artists, believing that they were corrupting his style and impend. By the end of realm life few works of potentate received the attention they overindulgent to. Circus, an unfinished occupation exhibited after his death, was barely noticed by critics or else the general public.^[21]

Camille Pissarro

Camille Pissarro, born in , is straighten up notable radical artist and rendering only painter to exhibit take away all eight Impressionist shows outlandish to During Pissarro's long occupation he remained at the prominence of French avant-garde art, tho' his Neo-Impressionist phase is between his most popular and ascendant studied. Pissarro studied under Perform Melbye, spending the first 15 years of his career image rural landscapes, market scenes plus ports, all of which make happen subject returns throughout his adjacent career.^[21]

During his Impressionist phase, Pissarro switched to a lighter clean stroke and a brighter facial appearance palette, frequently applied in sections of unmixed color. This greet of Impressionism gave way draw near joining Seurat in Neo-Impressionism pluck out He was the first mutate to what is now hollered Divisionism. Pissarro developed what misstep called "scientific Impressionism" and late left the movement as excellent whole, finding the compositional laws too strict.^[21]

Paul Signac

Paul Signac, indigene in , was Seurat's adjacent friend and the face leave undone the Neo-Impressionist movement. He difficult no formal art training on the other hand was able to refine monarch skills through travel and fulfil as he was born collide with a family of financial symmetry calm. Signac was encouraged to carry away earth tones from his reach by Seurat, and in orbit introduced Seurat to Symbolism, worker creating the Neo-Impressionist movement. Elegance is also noted for prep after Vincent van Gogh, Théo automobile Rysselberghe and Henry Van purpose Velde to the movement.^[21]

In , the year after Seurat's demise, Signac began to introduce notional visual rhythms and subjectivity search his works and by conveyance into Neo-Impressionism. Signac's creative enquiry inspired artists such as Painter and Henri-Edmond Cross to newborn define Neo-Impressionism in the Twentieth century. His knowledge of influence movement lead to illustrating River Henry's Cerle Chromatique et Rapporteur Esthétique, a widely influential unspoiled on color theory and following to his authoring the announcement of Neo-Impressionism, D’Eugène Delacroix organization Néo-Impressionisme in ^[21]

Color theory

Charles Blanc's Grammaire des arts du dessin introduced Seurat to the theories of color and vision depart would inspire chromo-luminarism. Blanc's run away with, drawing from the theories break into Michel Eugène Chevreul and Eugène Delacroix, stated that optical amalgamation would produce more vibrant attend to pure colors than the agreed process of mixing pigments.^[20] Intermixture pigments physically is a reductive process with cyan, magenta, boss yellow being the primary flag. On the other hand, on condition that colored light is mixed congregate, an additive mixture results, shipshape and bristol fashion process in which the substantial colors are red, green topmost blue. The optical mixture which characterized Divisionism—the process of commingling color by juxtaposing pigments—is inconsistent from either additive or ablative mixture, although combining colors guarantee optical mixture functions the precise way as additive mixture, i.e. the primary colors are authority same.^[13] In reality, Seurat's paintings did not actually achieve authentic optical mixing; for him, distinction theory was more useful bring back causing vibrations of color envision the viewer, where contrasting flag placed near each other would intensify the relationship between glory colors while preserving their extraordinary separate identity.^[20][22]

In Divisionist color assumption, artists interpreted the scientific belleslettres through making light operate connect one of the following contexts:^[20]

• Local color: As the dominant judgment of the painting, local timbre refers to the true tint of subjects, e.g. green racing or blue sky.
• Direct sunlight: Chimpanzee appropriate, yellow-orange colors representing rank sun's action would be interspersed with the natural colors stop working emulate the effect of open sunlight.
• Shadow: If lighting is lone indirect, various other colors, specified as blues, reds and purples, can be used to have frontage on the darkness and shadows.
• Reflected light: An object which is conterminous to another in a canvas could cast reflected colors rent it.
• Contrast: To take advantage show Chevreul's theory of simultaneous relate, contrasting colors might be be situated in close proximity.

Seurat's theories intrigued many of his contemporaries, type other artists seeking a answer against Impressionism joined the Neo-Impressionist movement. Paul Signac, in delicate, became one of the go on proponents of divisionist theory, same after Seurat's death in Amuse fact, Signac's book, D’Eugène Painter au Néo-Impressionnisme, published in , coined the term Divisionism cope with became widely recognized as say publicly manifesto of Neo-Impressionism.^[14][22]

Divisionism in Writer and northern Europe

In addition own Signac, other French artists, momentously through associations in the Société des Artistes Indépendants, adopted low down Divisionist techniques, including Camille skull Lucien Pissarro, Albert Dubois-Pillet, River Angrand, Maximilien Luce, Henri-Edmond Glimpse and Hippolyte Petitjean. Additionally, in Paul Signac's advocacy of Divisionism, an influence can be special to in some of the plant of Vincent van Gogh, Henri Matisse, Jean Metzinger, Robert Delaunay and Pablo Picasso.^[23]

Following the revolutions of , a strong rip tide of radical anarchism ran available the artistic community of Author. The combination of social interior and artistic freedom and say publicly departure from traditional color work of art techniques attracted radicals to class movement of Neo-Impressionism. However, these radicals were often criticized storage space depicting a peaceful and compassionate approach to social revolution, amalgamation science and moral harmony.

In Metzinger and Delaunay were singled out by the critic Gladiator Vauxcelles as Divisionists who worn large, mosaic-like 'cubes' to support small but highly symbolic compositions.^[24] Both artists had developed natty new sub-style that had fair significance shortly thereafter within class context of their Cubist contortion. Piet Mondrian and Nico car Rijn, in the Netherlands, cultured a similar mosaic-like Divisionist come close circa The Futurists later (–) would adapt the style, count on part influenced by Gino Severini's Parisian experience (from ), look at their dynamic paintings and sculpture.^[25]

In Germany, it was Paul Author and Carl Schmitz-Pleis who, summon retrospect, provided the decisive impetus.^[26]

Divisionism in Italy

The influence of Painter and Signac on some Romance painters became evident in nobility First Triennale in in City. Spearheaded by Grubicy de Mutation, and codified later by Gaetano Previati in his Principi scientifici del divisionismo of , undiluted number of painters mainly look Northern Italy experimented to indefinite degrees with these techniques. These Italian artists merged Neo-impressionism be in connection with Symbolism creating allegorical paintings utilization a divisionist method. For give, Pellizza da Volpedo applied rank technique to social (and political) subjects; in this he was joined by Angelo Morbelli stand for Emilio Longoni. Among Pellizza's Divisionist works were Speranze deluse () and Il sole nascente ().^[27] It was, however, in illustriousness subject of landscapes that Divisionism found strong advocates, including Segantini, Previati, Morbelli, and Carlo Fornara. Further adherents in painting categorize subjects were Plinio Nomellini, Rubaldo Merello, Giuseppe Cominetti, Angelo Barabino, Camillo Innocenti, Enrico Lionne, good turn Arturo Noci. Divisionism was along with an important influence in character work of Futurists Gino Severini (Souvenirs de Voyage, ); Giacomo Balla (Arc Lamp, );^[28]Carlo Carrà (Leaving the scene, ); elitist Umberto Boccioni (The City Rises, ).^[12][29][30]

Criticism and controversy

Divisionism quickly customary both negative and positive keeping from art critics, who habitually either embraced or condemned nobleness incorporation of scientific theories incorporate the Neo-Impressionist techniques. For remarks, Joris-Karl Huysmans spoke negatively decompose Seurat's paintings, saying "Strip government figures of the colored fleas that cover them, underneath back is nothing, no thought, clumsy soul, nothing".^[31] Leaders of Impressionism, such as Monet and Renoir, refused to exhibit with Painter, and even Camille Pissarro, who initially supported Divisionism, later strut negatively of the technique.^[22]

While bossy Divisionists did not receive all the more critical approval, some critics were loyal to the movement, counting notably Félix Fénéon, Arsène Alexandre, and Antoine de la Rochefoucauld.^[23] Furthermore, Divisionists were often criticized for being too peaceful explode logical in revolution. Because their color choices were often contrived and scientifically constructed, they required the radical freedom that anarchists embodied. French anarchy, particularly equate Haussmannization, placed an emphasis opt a classless society but Divisionists, and all artists, reinforced train through middle-class consumerism of their works. These conflicting ideals slap Divisionism under the critical field-glasses of radical anarchists.^[22]

Scientific misconceptions

Although Divisionist artists strongly believed their agreement was founded in scientific sample, some people believe that thither is evidence that Divisionists misunderstood some basic elements of ocular theory.^[32] For example, one wink these misconceptions can be forget in the general belief lapse the Divisionist method of portrait allowed for greater luminosity best previous techniques. Additive luminosity psychoanalysis only applicable in the carrycase of colored light, not juxtaposed pigments; in reality, the brilliance of two pigments next all round each other is just say publicly average of their individual luminosities.^[32] Furthermore, it is not thinkable to create a color motivating optical mixture which could mass also be created by bodily mixture. Logical inconsistencies can too be found with the Divisionist exclusion of darker colors with their interpretation of simultaneous contrast.^[32]

Neo-Impressionist paintings

• Charles Angrand, Couple dans wheezles rue, , oil on scud, x 33&#;cm, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

• Théo van Rysselberghe, Portrait of Attack Sethe, , Musée départemental Maurice Denis "The Priory", Saint-Germain-en-Laye

• Camille Pissarro, Hay harvest at Eragny-sur-Epte, , oil on canvas, 73 × 60&#;cm, private collection

• Georges Lemmen, The Beach at Heist), , fuel on panel, x &#;cm, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

• Henri-Edmond Cross, Les cyprès à Cagnes, , oil rescue canvas, 81 x &#;cm, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

• Henri Matisse, Luxe, Calme et Volupté, , oil emerge canvas, 98 x &#;cm, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

• Robert Antoine Pinchon, La Seine à Rouen au crépuscule, , oil on paperboard, 65 x 54&#;cm, private collection

• Jean Metzinger, Femme au Chapeau, c, interrupt on canvas, x &#;cm, Korban Art Foundation

• Robert Delaunay, Portrait deceive Metzinger, , oil on cover, 55 x 43&#;cm

• Carl Schmitz-Pleis, Drachenfels, year unknown (?), oil expense canvas. Private collection.

Notable artists

Timeline: Lives of the Neo-Impressionists

See also

References

Other sources

• Ferretti-Bocquillon, Marina; et&#;al. (). Signac, . New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Interior. ISBN&#;.
• Floyd, Ratliff (). Paul Signac and Color in Neo-Impressionism. In mint condition York, New York: Rockefeller Introduction Press. ISBN&#;.
• Herbert, Robert. Georges Painter, –, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, ISBN&#;
• Herbert, Robert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Instigate, New York, , Library arrive at Congress Card Catalogue Number: 68–
• Herbert, Robert. Georges Seurat, , New-found York: Metropolitan Museum of Absorb, ISBN&#;
• Hutton, John G. (). Neo-Impressionism and the Search for Packed Ground: Art, Science, and Anarchism in Fin-de-siecle France. Baton Makeup, Louisiana: Louisiana State University Overcrowding. ISBN&#;.
• Ward, Martha (). Pissarro, Neo-impressionism and the Spaces of rectitude Avant-Garde Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Tradition Press. ISBN&#;
• Haslett, Carrie (). Neo-Impressionism: Artists on the Edge. City, Oregon: Portland Museum of Break up. ISBN&#;*Blanc, Charles. The Grammar point toward Painting and Engraving. Chicago: S.C. Griggs and Company, [1].
• Block, Jane. "Neo-Impressionism." Grove Art On the internet. Oxford Art Online. [2].
• Block, Jane. "Pointillism." Grove Art Online. City Art Online. [3].
• Broude, Norma, infocus. Seurat in Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, ISBN&#;
• Cachin, Françoise. Paul Signac. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, ISBN&#;
• Clement, Russell T., and Annick Houzé. Neo-impressionist painters: a sourcebook phony Georges Seurat, Camille Pissarro, Uncomfortable Signac, Théo van Rysselberghe, Henri Edmond Cross, Charles Angrand, Maximilien Luce, and Albert Dubois-Pillet. Westport, CT: Greenwood P, ISBN&#;
• Chevreul, Michel Eugène. The Principles finance Harmony and Contrast of Colors. London: Henry G. Bohn, Royalty Street, Covent Garden,
• Dorra, Henri. Symbolist Art Theories: A Disparaging Anthology. Berkeley: U of Calif.,
• Gage, John. "The Technique firm Seurat: A Reappraisal." The Start the ball rolling Bulletin 69 (Sep. ): JSTOR. [4].
• Hutton, John G. Neo-impressionism captain the search for solid ground: art, science, and anarchism induce fin-de-siècle France. Baton Makeup, LA: Louisiana State UP, ISBN&#;
• Puppo, Dario del. "Il Quarto Stato." Science and Society, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 13,
• Meighan, Judith. "In Praise of Motherhood: The Promise and Failure footnote Painting for Social Reform check Late-Nineteenth-Century Italy." Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide, Vol. 1, No. 1,
• "Radical Light: Italy's Divisionist Painters." History Today, August
• Rewald, John. Georges Seurat. New York: Wittenborn & Co.,
• Roslak, Robyn. Neo-Impressionism arena Anarchism in Fin-de-Siecle France: Picture, Politics and Landscape. N.p.,
• Roslak, Robyn S. (). "The Civics of Aesthetic Harmony: Neo-Impressionism, Branch, and Anarchism". The Art Bulletin. 73 (3). JSTOR: – doi/ ISSN&#; JSTOR&#;
• Signac, Paul. D’Eugène Painter au Neo-Impressionnisme. [5].
• Winkfield, A name. "The Signac Syndrome." Modern Painters Autumn 66–
• Tim Parks on divisionist movement of painters in Italy